Most war films focus on the battlefields and the combat itself, but a new drama arriving on Netflix takes audiences into a far more complicated chapter of history. Nuremberg examines what happened after the guns fell silent and Hitler's regime crumbled—a period when the victorious Allied powers faced an unprecedented challenge: how to prosecute the architects of industrial-scale atrocity on an international stage. The film, directed by James Vanderbilt, stars Russell Crowe as Hermann Göring, Hitler's second-in-command, and Rami Malek as a US Army psychiatrist tasked with evaluating the Nazi leaders before their trial. It's a psychological thriller wrapped in a historical drama, exploring questions about the nature of evil that remain disturbingly relevant today.

A Window Into Post-War Justice

The Nuremberg Trials represent a pivotal moment in international law and human rights. Held between November 1945 and October 1946, these proceedings saw 22 high-ranking Nazi leaders brought before a tribunal composed of judges and prosecutors from the United States, Soviet Union, United Kingdom, and France. It was the first time an international court had convened to hold individuals—rather than nations—directly responsible for grave violations of international law, including crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes against peace.

The choice of Nuremberg as the trial location was deliberately symbolic. The Bavarian city had hosted the notorious Nazi rallies where the regime celebrated its power and ideology, so the Allies wanted the trials held there to represent the death of Nazism itself. Beyond symbolism, the city offered practical advantages: an undamaged courthouse and adequate prison facilities capable of handling such a monumental undertaking. Courtroom 600 in the Palace of Justice became the stage for history.

The Historical Context Behind the Film

The Nuremberg Trials emerged from careful deliberation among the Allied powers about what to do with captured Nazi war criminals. Some leaders favoured summary execution—swift, brutal justice without the machinery of law. However, US Secretary of War Henry Stimson and others argued for a different approach. They recognised that the Nazi regime had orchestrated some of the most horrific crimes in human history, with an estimated 16 million people killed between 1933 and 1945. This included the systematic extermination of six million Jews in the Holocaust, along with political prisoners, disabled individuals, and countless minorities targeted for elimination.

The scale of these atrocities demanded more than revenge. It demanded accountability rooted in law and precedent. The groundwork for this unprecedented tribunal was laid at the Moscow Conference of foreign ministers in October 1943, where the Declaration of Atrocities was signed. This commitment by the major Allied powers marked a historic shift in international relations—a move away from the Hague and Geneva Conventions, which had merely established norms for how warfare should be conducted, toward a framework that would hold individuals personally responsible for their actions.

The Drama at the Heart of the Story

The new Netflix film, adapted from Jack El-Hai's 2013 nonfiction book The Nazi and the Psychiatrist, centres on the relationship between two men: Rami Malek's character, Douglas Kelley, a US Army psychiatrist, and Russell Crowe's Hermann Göring. Kelley is brought in to evaluate the mental and psychological state of the prisoners before trial, a task that proves far more complex than a simple assessment. While Kelley encounters contempt and hostility from most of the Nazi defendants, his interactions with Göring take an entirely different turn.

Göring, captured by American troops in Austria as Nazi Germany collapsed, presents himself as civil and even occasionally charming. Yet Kelley recognises him for what he is: a highly intelligent narcissist convinced he will escape the proceedings without consequence. As their conversations deepen, Kelley finds himself drawn into a psychological chess match with Göring that forces him to confront uncomfortable questions about morality, power, and the nature of evil. Does winning a war grant moral superiority? Or are there only victors and vanquished, with no genuine high ground to claim?

This psychological tension becomes crucial to the prosecution's case. Understanding Göring's mind might be the key to unravelling him during cross-examination. Justice Robert H. Jackson, the US associate Supreme Court justice leading the prosecution, believes that seeing these Nazi leaders legally convicted and sentenced is essential for the world to heal. A successful trial could also serve as a warning to future would-be dictators that no one is above the law. But first, Kelley must navigate the murky waters of Göring's psychology and determine whether he can deliver the insights Jackson needs to secure a conviction.

The Cast and Creative Team

Director James Vanderbilt, known for the film Truth, brings his talent for exploring complex institutional and moral questions to this historical drama. The casting of Russell Crowe as Göring is particularly intriguing, as Crowe has built a career playing men of power and ambition. Rami Malek, fresh from his acclaimed performances in recent years, takes on the role of Kelley, a man caught between his professional obligations and his growing understanding of the abyss he's staring into. The supporting cast includes Sadie Sink as Robert Jackson, the man determined to make history through law rather than vengeance.

Why This Story Matters Now

The Nuremberg Trials established legal precedents that continue to influence international law today. They created a framework for accountability that would eventually lead to the International Criminal Court and other mechanisms for prosecuting crimes against humanity. The trials sent a message that was revolutionary at the time: individuals could be held accountable for following orders, that obedience to a regime does not absolve one of moral responsibility, and that justice, however imperfect, is preferable to unchecked revenge.

The film's exploration of these themes through the psychological tension between Kelley and Göring offers a fresh angle on a well-documented historical event. Rather than focusing solely on the courtroom drama or the verdict, it examines the human complexity of confronting evil—how proximity to it can challenge one's certainties, and how understanding doesn't necessarily mean sympathy or forgiveness.

Related Articles

<p>Nuremberg arrives at a moment when questions about accountability, justice, and the rule of law feel particularly urgent. The film doesn't shy away from the discomfort of its subject matter. Instead, it leans into the psychological and moral complexities that make the post-war trials far more interesting than a simple victory narrative. Russell Crowe and Rami Malek's performances promise to explore the darker corners of human nature and the difficult work of building a just society from the ashes of totalitarianism. For viewers interested in history, psychology, and the ongoing struggle to define justice on an international stage, this is essential viewing.</p>